APC.org > ICT policy > LAC > Information
 
 GO >> | Site map | Contact us
All themes
-- Todos los temas --
Acceso
Ancho de banda e infraestructura
Capacitación y educación
Censura
Ciencia y tecnología
CMSI y seguimiento
Comercio electrónico
Contenido y lengua
Derechos de comunicación
Estrategias nacionales de TIC
Género
Gobernanza de internet
Gobierno electrónico
Legislación y regulación
Libertad de expresión
Medios
Propiedad intelectual
Seguridad y privacidad
Software
Telecomunicaciones
TIC para el desarrollo
 HOME 
 NEWS 
 INFORMATION 
 STATISTICS 
 EVENTS 
 ORGANISATIONS 
 

Information > Gobernanza de internet

Respuesta oficial de Estados Unidos al informe del Grupo de trabajo en gobernanza de internet

08/16/2005 El Mundo -- Comments of the United States of America on Internet Governance

Introduction

The United States of America welcomes this opportunity to provide comments on the report of
the United Nations Working Group on Internet Governance (WGIG). We would like to take this
opportunity to thank the Chairman, Secretariat and WGIG members for their efforts to tackle
such a complex and challenging topic. Given the importance of the Internet to current economic,
social, and political developments, it is critical that all stakeholders in the WSIS process work
together collaboratively and constructively to find a consensus at the Tunis Phase of the Summit.

The United States reiterates its commitment to the freedom of expression, to the need to preserve the security and stability of the Internet, and to infrastructure development. With these
fundamental principles in mind, we offer a series of general comments on the report as well as
specific comments on individual public policy issues referenced in the document.

General Comments

As stated above, the United States appreciates the hard work and dedication of the WGIG in its
efforts to produce the report. We recognize the WGIG’s effort to help frame the global dialogue
on Internet governance by providing an understandable working definition, identifying some of
the public policy issues, and the roles of the various stakeholders. With respect to the roles of
the stakeholders identified in the report, the United States believes that, while governments
naturally have a key role in the development and implementation of public policy, consultation
and cooperation with the private sector and civil society are critical to ensuring effective,
efficient and representative outcomes.

The United States remains open to discussing with all stakeholders ways to improve the technical efficiency as well as the transparency and openness of existing governance structures. However, it is important that the global community recognize that the existing structures have worked effectively to make the Internet the highly robust and geographically diverse medium that it is today. The security and stability of the Internet must be maintained.

The United States continues to support ubiquitous access to the Internet and the development of
Internet infrastructure around the globe. Continued internationalization of the Internet is
evidenced by the recent creation of Regional Internet Registries (RIRs) for Latin America and
Africa and the enhanced efforts of the Internet community to work towards an equitable
distribution of IP addresses. For example, as of June 2005, cumulative IPv4 address allocations
had the following geographical breakdown – 33% to the Asia Pacific Region, 32% to North
America, 31% to Europe, 3% to South America and 1% to Africa. For that same period
cumulative IPv6 allocations were – 56% to Europe, 23% to the Asia Pacific Region, 17% to
North America, 3% to Latin American and 1% to Africa. In addition, the establishment of 103
root servers, including mirror roots, a vast majority of which are located outside of the United
States, demonstrates that the Internet and its core resources are not centralized in one country.
The decentralization of the Internet is further evidenced by the level of innovation that occurs at
the edges of the network. It is at the edges where individuals, groups and corporations alike have the opportunity to add value to the network through pioneering applications and services.
Local empowerment challenges traditional trade paradigms and reinforces the importance of all
stakeholders in safeguarding the security, stability and robustness of this interconnected network of networks. What happens at one point in the network has the potential to impact other points in the network, highlighting the need for appropriate public policy at the local and national levels, supplemented by cooperation at the international level. It is at the edge where the true opportunity, promise and full participatory nature of the Internet is realized.

Finally, the United States would like to highlight a fundamental area of public policy which is
absent from the WGIG report – the role of an enabling environment in Internet development and diffusion. To maximize the economic and social benefits of the Internet, governments must
focus on creating, within their own nations, the appropriate legal, regulatory, and policy
environment that encourages privatization, competition, and liberalization. In particular, the role
of the private sector and civil society as the driver of innovation and private investment in the
development of the Internet is critical. Value is added at the edges of the network, in both
developed and developing countries, when the domestic policy environment encourages
investment and innovation.

Comments on specific Internet- related public policy issues

Freedom of Expression: The United States reconfirms the importance of the fundamental right to
freedom of expression and to the free flow of information as contained in Article 19 of the
Universal Declaration of Human Rights, as reaffirmed in the Geneva Declaration of Principles
adopted at the first phase of WSIS. A free, independent print, broadcast and online media is
one of the key institutions of democratic life. The United States believes that no nation can
develop politically or economically without the ability of its citizens to openly and freely express
their opinions in an environment in which everyone can seek, receive and impart information.
The United States fully supports the principle that all measures taken in relation to the Internet,
in particular those measures taken on grounds of security or to fight crime, not lead to
infringements on the freedom of expression.

Internet Stability, Security and Cybercrime: Building confidence and security in the use of
Information and Communication Technology (ICT) systems and networks is a priority of the
United States. These systems and networks are subject to threats and vulnerabilities from
multiple sources and different geographic locations; security requires a concerted preventive
effort by all stakeholders, appropriate to their roles. National action and international
collaboration across a range of legal, enforcement, administrative and technical areas are
required to build a global culture of cybersecurity. In developing a national cybersecurity
strategy, governments should draw upon existing structures and processes such as: the Council of Europe Convention on Cybercrime, UNGA Resolutions “Combating the criminal misuse of
information technologies” (55/63 and 56/121) and “Creation of a Global Culture of
Cybersecurity” (57/239), and actions taken by computer security incident response teams
(CSIRTs).

The Internet Domain Name and Addressing System: The United States continues to support the
private sector led technical coordination and management of the Internet’s domain name and
addressing system (DNS) in the form of the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and
Numbers (ICANN), with government advice on DNS issues provided by the Government
Advisory Committee (GAC). We also recognize that governments have legitimate public policy
and sovereignty concerns with respect to the management of their country code top level
domains (ccTLD) and the United States is committed to working with the international
community to address these concerns, bearing in mind the fundamental need to ensure stability
and security of the Internet’s DNS. With respect to international coordination of the DNS, WSIS
should recognize the role of existing institutions, encourage effective, bottom up decision
making at the local level, the continued deployment of mirror roots and responsible address
allocation policies.

Multilingualism: The United States believes that the development of technologies that facilitate
the use of domain names in languages other than Latin based character sets is an important step in making the Internet truly global. WSIS should encourage continued work and collaboration on internationalized domain names by existing standards bodies and processes by which agreement can be reached on appropriate language tables.

Interconnection Costs: The United States believes that arrangements for international Internet
connections should continue to be the subject of private, commercial negotiations. The
international settlement regime that applies under the telecommunications regime cannot be
applied to Internet traffic. WSIS should look to ongoing work on this important topic in existing
institutions, such as the ITU and the OECD, and encourage national authorities to take steps to
open markets to competitive entry and promote increased competition in the market place. A
competitive market creates an enabling environment that encourages investment and/or
international infrastructure assistance. The developme nt of regional Internet Exchange Points
and local content should also be encouraged.

Intellectual Property Rights: The United States attaches great importance to a comprehensive,
effective and properly enforced intellectual property system and believes that any Information
Society envisioned by the WSIS must clearly and explicitly recognize that such a system is
essential to the Information Society because it creates an incentive for creativity and innovation.

To that end, WSIS and its documents must recognize, respect and support the existing
international intellectual property system. The balance between owners and users of intellectual
property is an important underpinning of an effective intellectual property system. Existing
international intellectual property agreements encompass and reflect the balance between owners and users of intellectual property. Indeed, this balance is struck so that intellectual property owners are encouraged to develop and disseminate their works and inventions to the public for use and enjoyment. The United States believes that the appropriate United Nations forum for dealing with intellectual property issues is the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), which has regularly examined the interaction of cyberspace and intellectual property since the early days of the Internet.

Spam: Increasingly, spam is, in large part, a security issue: spam is one way in which viruses
and other security threats can be delivered to computers. Industry must play a lead role in
developing technical tools to address this problem. In addition, many of these security threats
often result from criminal conduct. The Convention on Cybercrime provides a comprehensive
framework to address these threats. In 2003, the United States enacted an anti-spam law
established a framework of civil and criminal enforcement tools to help America’s consumers,
businesses, and families combat unsolicited commercial e-mail. However, the United States
does not believe that the statute alone will solve spam. The United States approach to combating spam relies on a combination of legal tools for effective law enforcement, development and deployment of technology tools and best practices by the private sector, and consumer and business education. We believe that work undertaken to combat spam should ensure that email continues to be a viable and valuable means of communication. Governments have a role to play in educating consumers and enforcing spam laws. To this end, governments should encourage spam enforcement agencies to join the London Action Plan on international spam enforcement cooperation.

Data Protection and Privacy: The United States appreciates the concerns expressed in the report on data protection and privacy. Protecting the privacy of individuals’ sensitive personal
information is a priority for the United States government and for United States consumers.
Companies have an important role to play by implementing reasonable safeguards to protect
sensitive consumer data. The United States also believes that multilateral and private-sector
initiatives have a strong and important role to play in encouraging the development and use of
privacy-enhancing technologies and in promoting consumer education and awareness about
online privacy issues. A deliberate and balanced approach to privacy that is open to innovations
offers the best environment for Internet expansion. Any effective approach to ensuring
protection of personal information includes: appropriate laws to protect consumer privacy in
highly sensitive areas such as financial, medical, and children's privacy; government
enforcement of these laws; and encouragement of private sector efforts to protect consumer
privacy.

Consumer Protection: The United States believes that a vigorous, competitive electronic
marketplace benefits consumers. Consumer protection policy should ensure that consumers can
make well-informed decisions about their choices in this marketplace and that sellers will fulfill
their promises by the products they offer. To this end, governments should protect consumers
by: (1) enforcing laws against practices that harm consumers; (2) disseminating information and educating consumers; and (3) encouraging private sector leadership to develop codes of conduct and to provide easy-to-use alternative dispute resolution mechanisms for addressing consumer complaints. These principles are expressed in various existing international guidelines for consumer protection, including the United Nations Guidelines on Consumer Protection, the
OECD Guidelines for Consumer Protection in Electronic Commerce, and the APEC Consumer
Protection Principles.

Human Capacity Building: The United States believes that each person should have the
opportunity to acquire the necessary skills and knowledge in order to understand, participate
actively in, and benefit fully from, the Information Society and the knowledge economy. This
requires increased capacity building in the areas of ICT policy and regulation, technology knowhow, access to information, and the application of ICT to various development sectors. WSIS should support the continuing work of multiple stakeholders to build capacity of professionals and institutions in developing nations and to ensure the efforts are both technically innovative and supportive of market-based approaches.

Meaningful Participation in Global Public Policy Development: The United States encourages
the participation of developing countries in ICT forums as a complement to national
development efforts related to ICTs. As such, it is important to develop the capacity of
government officials and other stakeholders who can address the complicated issues and difficult choices raised by the evolving ICT environment. Through the U.S. Telecommunications
Training Institute (USTTI), the United States, together with U.S. industry, has demonstrated its
commitment to capacity building by providing tuition free training courses for policy makers
around the world in the telecommunications, broadcast and ICT-related fields.

Conclusion

The United States once again thanks the WGIG for its report and reiterates its willingness to
engage in dialogue related to Internet governance in relevant multiple fora. Given the breadth of topics potentially encompassed under the rubric of “Internet governance” there is no one venue to appropriately address the subject in its entirety. While the United States recognizes that the current Internet system is working, we encourage an ongoing dialogue with all stakeholders around the world in the various fora as a way to facilitate discussion and to advance our shared interest in the ongoing robustness and dynamism of the Internet. The focus of these discussions should be on how all stakeholders can continue to collaborate in addressing Internet related issues. In these fora, the United States will continue to support market-based approaches and private sector leadership in Internet development broadly.

Date: 08/16/2005
Location: Internacional
Theme: Gobernanza de internet, CMSI y seguimiento

Comments
All countries
-- All countries --
Argentina
Bolivia
Brasil
Chile
Colombia
Costa Rica
Cuba
Ecuador
El Salvador
Guatemala
Honduras
México
Nicaragua
Panamá
Paraguay
Perú
R. Dominicana
Uruguay
Venezuela
ALC
Internacional
Este sitio fue actualizado por última vez en marzo del 2010 y esta disponible solamente a efectos de archivo histórico.
Para información sobre las iniciativas actuales, visite el sitio de la Asociación para el Progreso de las Comunicaciones

Creative Commons: Some Rights Reserved
Ciertos derechos reservados

Monitor de Políticas TIC en América Latina y el Caribe (ALC) de la
Asociación para el Progreso de las Comunicaciones (APC) desde 2001

Apoyado por HIVOS